Anton Pavlovich Chekhov created the play “ The Cherry Orchard” on the eve of a series of revolutions. Many important topics are touched upon in this work. The author reflects on the future of Russia and Russian society as a whole. Comedy, according to the author’s genre definition, reflects that turning point new century, when the old has already died and the new has not yet been born. No one can understand what will happen to them in the future, but everyone is waiting for something.
The characters in the work belong to several generations.
Our experts can check your essay using Unified State Exam criteria
Experts from the site Kritika24.ru
Teachers of leading schools and current experts of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.
All the characters in the play are waiting for the onset of a new life, some with fear and uncertainty, and others with faith and hope. The problem is that the characters don't live in the present. Some idealize the past, others idealize the future, but all this happens outside the cherry orchard, which is the personification of that very real life.
The Cherry Orchard is an eternal present that connects both the past and the future together in one place. Ranevskaya’s ancestors lived here long before her appearance. The garden embodies the only truth of life, a truth that the heroes of the work cannot find. “Eternal student” Petya Trofimov says that all of Russia is a garden with wonderful places and wide open spaces. With these words, the hero calls for active work, preaching the “highest truth.” But in life he never goes beyond words, and remains a “klutz.”
The author also draws attention to the failure of the nobility and creates a collective image of Ranevskaya, which embodies the idleness of life and stupidity. For her, the cherry orchard is a connection with the past, with youth and fading beauty, but the heroine does not live in the present, but only indulges in dreams. “Oh my dear, my tender, beautiful garden!.. My life, my youth, my happiness, goodbye!..”, exclaims Ranevskaya. She doesn’t want to look at life realistically, so she sells the garden because of debts and leaves for Paris.
The Cherry Orchard is perceived by A.P. Chekhov as the spiritual center of the play, an eternal living organism in which everything is subject to the law of life. By cutting down the garden, the ax breaks the only line connecting the characters in the play. This is the author's warning. He warns readers against losing touch with ancestors and descendants, with peace and truth.
Updated: 2018-04-21
Attention!
Thank you for your attention.
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and click Ctrl+Enter.
Thus you will provide invaluable benefits project and other readers.
13. Why is the play called “The Cherry Orchard”?
Answer: The play “The Cherry Orchard” is named so because it talks about something beautiful, dearly loved. Chekhov could not finally decide on the name, either Cherry or The Cherry Orchard. Later, poets suggested to him that it’s better to use cherry, because the gentle sound “e” in the word Cherry, as if trying to use it to caress the former beautiful, but
Now unnecessary life, which he tearfully destroyed in his play. “The Cherry Orchard” does not bring in any income; it preserves within itself and in its blooming whiteness the poetry of the former lordly life. Such a garden grows and blooms for whim, for the eyes of spoiled aesthetes. It’s a pity to destroy it, but it’s necessary, because the process economic development countries require this.
14. What is the beauty of Tyutchev’s poetry about nature?
Answer: Tyutchev's love lyrics are rich in philosophical thoughts; he embodied his thoughts in his love for women. The love lyrics are permeated with a powerful dramatic, tragic sound, which is associated with the circumstances of his personal life. Tyutchev's masterpieces of love poetry were born from genuine pain, suffering, a feeling of irreparable loss, a sense of guilt and repentance. Tyutchev in his lyrics reveals himself as a psychologist and a subtle lyricist.
15. What is the meaning of the title of the drama "Thunderstorm"?
Answer: The title of the drama “The Thunderstorm” has a huge meaning. This play is not only a majestic natural phenomenon, but a social upheaval. The drama reflected all social phenomena: the rise of the social movement and the mood of the people who lived in those times were shown. Also, this is a symbol of changes in the “dark kingdom”, in the way of life that existed for several centuries in Russian life. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
16. What is the meaning of the title "The Enchanted Wanderer"?
The story “The Enchanted Wanderer” is named so because the word “enchanted” means bewitched, numb. Also, the word "fascinated" also has a broad meaning. Its meaning is related to the verb “to be enchanted.” The hero of the story responds to beauty, appreciates it, can describe it, be it the beauty of an animal or a woman. He is fascinated by beauty native nature, the beauty of Dido’s horse, the beauty of the young gypsy Grusha - “…” “Wanderer” is clear at first glance: it is used in its literal meaning, that is, it means a person who has traveled a lot, wandered in his life, seen a lot, learned about the world. However, upon reflection, I realized that not everything is so simple. Flyagin is a man who wanders not only through the outer world, but also through the inner world, exploring the secret corners of his soul and the souls of other people. The whole life of a person is a long journey from beginning to end, from birth to death. The author leads his hero from event to event and brings him “to the last haven of life - to the monastery.” It seems to me that the word “wanderer” in the title of the work contains both meanings. So, the Enchanted Wanderer is a person called to go through life, accepting it as it is, being under its spell, doing everything that is intended for him.
(347 words) Genre literary work plays a huge role in the creation of a particular poem, tragedy or novel. Features of the genre influence the plot and construction of the text, as well as the behavior of the characters and the outcome of events. That is why it is important to clearly understand what type of work the work belongs to. Nevertheless, fiction knows such cases when it is difficult for the reader to draw a conclusion about what genre the poet or writer chose. One of similar examples is a play by Russian playwright A.P. Chekhov's "The Cherry Orchard".
Anton Pavlovich himself called “The Cherry Orchard” a comedy. But is it worth approaching this issue so categorically? Of course, it is difficult to give a definite answer to the question of what genre this work belongs to, since it combines features of farce, lyrical comedy, and tragedy.
Despite doubts, you should trust the author of the play, since A.P. Chekhov portrays heroes in a comic form. Suffice it to recall the tricks of Charlotte Ivanovna, the conversations of Gaev and his sister Ranevskaya with the furniture and rooms of their father’s house, as well as “twenty-two misfortunes” or the awkward Epikhodov. The image of Petya Trofimov is also considered noteworthy in this regard: the young man considers himself almost a philosopher, he dares to express ideas of human relationships that are shocking to the older generation (“We are above love!”). At the same time, Trofimov remains an “eternal student” who cannot even take care of his own galoshes.
It is important to note that most of the characters in the work contradict themselves. For example, Gaev, saddened by the sale of his house, heard the familiar sound of billiard balls hitting, instantly perked up and forgot about all the troubles around him. Such behavior of the characters suggests the tragicomic nature of the play. On the one hand, they are really saddened by the upcoming cutting down of the cherry orchard, but on the other... their bitterness and regret about the loss of their beloved and dear home are so fleeting. This is why it is difficult for the reader to decide whether to laugh or cry at a book. The image of Firs is also ambiguous. This hero personifies the image of an obsolete Russian Empire. It would seem that he should be pitied, since the gentlemen, despite his devotion, completely forgot about him. But Chekhov understood that the country needed change in any case, which means he did not have a clear goal to make us cry over the death of Firs.
Thus, the play by A.P. Chekhov's "The Cherry Orchard" can be considered a tragicomedy or a comedy, as the author himself believed.
Interesting? Save it on your wall!Lyrical comedy is a unique literary genre, which is characterized by the absence of division of characters into good and bad, the absence of such action - instead, “internal” action, in which events are replaced by details that play a significant role in the plot of the work. This genre was invented by A.P. Chekhov and realized it in the plays “The Cherry Orchard”, “The Seagull”, “Three Sisters” and “Uncle Vanya”. “The Cherry Orchard” is a lyrical comedy because outwardly it is a comedy, but the lyricism is characterized by the tragedy that is present in it. In the Russian repertoire there are many comedies that fall under the definition of “lyrical comedy”: A.S. Griboyedov with his “Woe from Wit” and D.I. Fonvizin with the comedy “The Minor” - and these two plays have obvious similarities with Chekhov’s “The Cherry Orchard”.
In “Woe from Wit,” the comedic component of the work comes to the fore: Famusov with his fingers plugged into his ears, flatly refusing to listen to Chatsky’s liberal ideas, Molchalin with the phrase: “Your Spitz is a lovely Spitz,” - it was funny in the 19th century, it’s funny in our time and Chekhov in this regard lags behind his fellow writer.
Our experts can check your essay according to the Unified State Exam criteria
Experts from the site Kritika24.ru
Teachers of leading schools and current experts of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.
Gaev and long, extensive monologues dedicated to the love of the closet, the deaf old man Firs, who was forgotten at home at the end of the play - Chekhov and Griboyedov are similar in the way their works are structured - comedy is in the foreground.
At D.I. Fonvizin has no problems with humor either - as Chekhov and Griboyedov did later, he gave comedy a place to be: Mitrofanushka is an ignoramus who uttered a phrase that became an aphorism: “I don’t want to study, I want to get married,” - Prostakova’s brother, whose dreams boil down to this or that otherwise to the pigs.
In all three works there is an element of comedy brought to the fore.
But also in all three comedies there is also a flip side - a tragic one.
The main task of “Woe from Wit” is to show all the meanness and inferiority of the nobility of the 18th century, which existed in the 19th century with its renovations and liberalization, and Chekhov tried to convey an almost similar idea in “The Cherry Orchard,” where the nobility of the late 19th century cannot live in the 20th century with the emergence of the working class and general modernization and, ultimately, revolution. The conflict of time is also present in Fonvizin’s “Minor”, where Starodum - a character with a telling surname and a man from the time of Emperor Peter I - teaches the present-day nobles how to live.
